A recent podcast unpacks the contentious '10x engineer' concept, arguing its pitfalls and emphasizing the often-overlooked aspects of genuine engineering value. The discussion also redefines software engineering as a complex discipline far beyond just writing code.
A deep dive into the historical origins and evolving definitions of 'clean code,' questioning its modern relevance beyond dogmatic rules. Experts explore if clean code is a timeless ideal or a context-dependent practice, emphasizing habitability and human-centric design.
Software developer Emily B. challenges Kent Beck's widely recognized 'test desiderata', proposing a new framework that reframes desirable test properties for modern development. Her analysis identifies a need to differentiate between individual test characteristics and the overarching goals of an entire test suite.
Dave Farley discusses the enduring impact of 'Clean Code' and its alignment with the empirical principles of 'Modern Software Engineering'. He highlights how both frameworks aim to simplify complexity and foster rapid, safe software evolution.
Despite decades of attempts to standardize terms like 'mock,' 'stub,' and 'fake,' semantic diffusion continues to plague software testing. A new proposal aims to clarify communication by focusing on an object's functional role rather than its often-misunderstood label.
Software engineering luminary Dave Farley recently explored the profound alignment between Gene Kim's 'Five Ideals' from *The Unicorn Project* and the data-driven principles detailed in his own seminal works. The discussion highlights how narrative insights into broken engineering cultures directly translate into actionable practices for building better software.
A recent discussion on 'Modern Software Engineering' highlights the contentious practices dividing the tech industry, from development methodologies to project management. Experts weigh in on the evidence and experience behind these debates.